Appeal No. 1999-2323
Application No. 08/434519
102(e) based on Wefler, and the examiner's rejection of claims
4 through 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) based on Wefler and
Demarest '229. However, we have not sustained the examiner's
rejections of claims 2 and 3 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) based,
respectively, on Wefler and Moore, and Wefler and Morris.
Thus, the decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOHN P. MCQUADE )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
JENNIFER D. BAHR )
Administrative Patent Judge )
CEF:lmb
HARRY A. PACINI
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007