THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WILLIAM KELLER and CHARLES BERGERON
____________
Appeal No. 1999-2368
Application No. 08/771,0181
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, NASE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 3 and 5 to 9. Claims 2, 10, 11 and 13
to 21 have been allowed. Claims 4 and 12 have been canceled.2
1Application for patent filed December 20, 1996.
2The appellants cancellation of claims 4 and 12 was set
forth in the amendment filed October 14, 1997 (Paper No. 4).
We note that this cancellation of claims 4 and 12 has not been
(continued...)
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007