Ex parte KELLER et al. - Page 10




          Appeal No. 1999-2368                                      Page 10           
          Application No. 08/771,018                                                  


          considered to be the recited "plurality of photographic                     
          storage panels."  Thus, Yang's cover 1 including front wall 11              
          with window 111 and rear wall 12 is not readable on the                     
          claimed "means for housing said photographic storage panels,                
          said means for housing including a cover member, said means                 
          for housing concealing said plurality of photographic storage               
          panels and any photographs disposed within an associated                    
          photographic insert sleeve member when said cover member is in              
          a closed position," since the window 111 permits the pictures               
          to be seen when the front wall 11 of the cover 1 is closed                  
          (see column 1, lines 54-60 of Yang).  Accordingly, the                      
          examiner has failed to establish the obviousness of the                     
          claimed invention.                                                          


               Furthermore, we note that the claimed "plurality of                    
          photographic insert sleeve members" capable of storing at                   
          least one photograph disposed on a plurality of photographic                
          storage panels as recited in claim 1 is not suggested by any                
          of the applied prior art.                                                   


                                       REMAND                                         







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007