THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHAEL J. CAREY and JOSEPH H. EDWARDS
____________
Appeal No. 1999-2537
Application No. 08/619,269
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, NASE, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent
Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 12, 15 to 18, 22, 23 and
25 to 27. Claim 24 has been allowed. Claims 10, 19 and 201
have been withdrawn from consideration under 37 CFR § 1.142(b)
1Claims 9, 12 and 16 were amended subsequent to the final
rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007