Ex parte HALLOCK et al. - Page 6




          Appeal No. 1999-2540                                                        
          Application 08/770,411                                                      


                                   THE PRIOR ART                                      


               The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence of              
          obviousness are:                                                            


          Neilson et al. (Neilson)           5,330,518                July            
          19, 1994                                                                    
          Imran et al. (Imran)          5,348,554                Sept. 20,            
          1994                                                                        


                                    THE REJECTION                                     


               Claims 1 through 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                   
          103(a) as being unpatentable over Imran in view of Neilson.                 


               Attention is directed to the appellants’ main and reply                
          briefs (Paper Nos. 9 and 12) and to the examiner’s final                    
          rejection and answer (Paper Nos. 5 and 10) for the respective               
          positions of the appellants and the examiner with regard to                 
          the merits of this rejection.                                               


                                          6                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007