THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAVID J. WALSH
____________
Appeal No. 1999-2624
Application No. 08/561,658
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CALVERT, STAAB and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1-10 and 13-18. Claims 11 and 12, which
were objected to by the examiner as being dependent upon a
rejected base claim in the final rejection (Paper No. 7), were
canceled and re-written as new independent claim 19 and
dependent claim 20
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007