Ex parte TERASAWA et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1999-2677                                                        
          Application 08/878,769                                                      


          (Japanese Patent Document)                                                  




                                    THE REJECTION                                     
               Claims 3, 22, 23 and 30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                 
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over the Japanese reference in               
          view of the British reference.                                              
               Attention is directed to the appellants’ main and reply                
          briefs (Paper Nos. 31 and 34) and to the examiner’s final                   
          rejection and answer (Paper Nos. 28 and 33) for the respective              
          positions of the appellants and the examiner with regard to                 
          the merits of this rejection.                                               
                                     DISCUSSION                                       
               The Japanese reference discloses an air bag apparatus                  
          (see Figure 1) comprising an air bag cover 1, a retainer 4, an              
          inflator 6 and an air bag 8.  The retainer constitutes a base               
          plate and includes an upstanding side wall 5 which interlocks               
          with folded portions 3 on tongue pieces 2 depending from the                
          cover (see Figure 2) to keep the cover from separating from                 
          the retainer upon inflation of the air bag.  As conceded by                 
          the examiner (see page 2 in the final rejection), the                       

                                          3                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007