The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte BRADLEY LINDEN, DONALD F. PALME, II,
PAUL J. BUSCEMI and THOMAS J. HOLMAN
____________
Appeal No. 1999-2789
Application No. 08/805,633
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 94, 95, 104 and 140. Claims 96, 97, 102,
103, 105 through 113, 130 and 131, the only other claims still
pending in this application, stand allowed.1
1It does not appear that the numbering of the claims in
this application is in accordance with the requirements of 37
CFR
§ 1.126. We leave it to appellants and the examiner to treat
this issue in any further prosecution of the application. For
purposes of this appeal, we will refer to the claims on appeal
(continued...)
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007