Ex parte LINDEN et al. - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 1999-2789                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/805,633                                                                                                             


                 Appellants' invention relates to a method for permanently                                                                              
                 closing a septal defect in a body, such as in the human heart.                                                                         
                 Independent claim 140 is representative of the subject matter                                                                          
                 on appeal and a copy of that claim, as reproduced from the                                                                             
                 Appendix to appellants' brief, is appended to this decision.                                                                           


                 The sole prior art reference of record relied upon by the                                                                              
                 examiner is:                                                                                                                           
                 Kamiya et al. (Kamiya)                                5,192,301                                    Mar. 9,                             
                 1993                                                                                                                                   


                 Claims 94, 95, 104 and 140 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                                                              
                 § 102(b) as being anticipated by Kamiya.                                                                                               




                          1(...continued)                                                                                                               
                 by their current numbers.  In addition, we note that                                                                                   
                 notwithstanding the examiner’s apparent verification of the                                                                            
                 continuing data information on the face of the file, it does                                                                           
                 not appear that this application is a division of S.N.                                                                                 
                 08/323,824, filed 10/17/94 as the filewrapper currently shows.                                                                         
                 It would seem that the correct information is that the present                                                                         
                 application is a division of                                                                                                           
                 S.N. 08/383,824, filed 02/06/95.  This issue should likewise                                                                           
                 be addressed by the examiner and appellants during any further                                                                         
                 prosecution.                                                                                                                           
                                                                           2                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007