Interference 103,482 are average values and can be derived by statistical/ mathematical calculations.... The APJ indicated that the singular form of the term “sequence length” is customary for and consistent with an average sequence length (Paper No. 60, p. 10, first full sentence). According to the APJ, the Declarations of Drs. Atwood and Scott do not expressly contradict Dr. Winter’s declaration (Paper No. 60, first full para.). The APJ held that dependent Claim 8 is properly construed to include all the limitations of the claims upon which it depends. Accordingly, he denied the motion for judgment that Dolle’s Claim 8 is unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 112, fourth paragraph (Paper No. 60, p. 11, first five lines). The APJ held that Ewen had not met his burden to establish the unpatentability of Claims 4-6, 8 and 12-26 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first and second paragraphs (Paper No. 60, p. 11, second full para.), because he had not explained why the claim language does not satisfy the requirements thereof. Ewen relies on the declarations of Drs. Scott and Atwood in support of the motions. The APJ (1) found that “[i]t is only 25Page: Previous 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007