Interference 103,482 necessary to determine the average sequence length through conventional means known in the art” (Paper No. 60, p. 12, second full para.); (2) found that “Ewen has not asserted that one having ordinary skill in the art would not be able to determine the average length of the syndiotactic and isotactic sequences of polymers made according to the process set out in Dolle’s claims” (Paper No. 60, p. 12, second full para.); and (3) concluded that “the specification preferably omits . . . that which is well known in the art” (Paper No. 60, p. 12, second full para.). Finally, the APJ denied Ewen’s motion for judgment of unpatentability under 35 U.S.C. § 102 or 103 over U.S. Patent 4,892,851 or Ewen JACS because (Paper No. 60, p. 13): Neither reference describes or suggests a process for forming polymers where the average sequence length for both the syndiotactic and isotactic sequences is at least 3 and no more than 50. The fact that some triad or even pentad meso sequences are present in the syndiotactic polymers described by the references is an insufficient basis to find that the average sequence length for both types of sequence [sic] falls in the range of 3 to 50 monomers. EE. June 30, 1998 -- The APJ entered Decision On Ewen Responsive Motion No. 4 Under 37 CFR § 1.633(f),(j) And 35 U.S.C. 120 (Paper 22)(Paper No. 61). The APJ denied Ewen’s motion to be accorded benefit of the July 15, 1988, filing 26Page: Previous 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007