THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 37
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
KANJYO ORINO
Junior Party,1
NOBUYUKI TANIGUCHI, MASAAKI NAKAI, TAKANOBU OMAKI,
TOKUJI ISHIDA, HISAYUKI MASUMOTO,
HISASHI TOKUMARU and TSUNEYO METABI
Senior Party.2
____________
Interference No. 104,184
____________
Before URYNOWICZ, CAROFF and DOWNEY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
JUDGMENT
The parties Orino and Taniguchi et al. have failed to
make any showing why judgment should not be entered against
1 Application No. 07/598,438 filed October 16, 1990, now U.S. Patent No.
5,067,802 issued November 26, 1991. Assignor to Canon Kabushiki Kaisha.
Accorded benefit of Japanese Application No. HEI-01-281175 filed
October 27, 1989.
2 Application No. 08/320,372 filed October 11, 1994. Accorded benefit of
U.S. Application Nos. 07/981,110 filed November 24, 1992, now abandoned; and
07/389,908 filed August 4, 1989, now Patent No. 5,274,414 issued
December 28, 1993 and Japanese Application No. 196626/1988 filed
August 5, 1988.
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007