Interference No. 104,241
order to show cause why judgment should not be entered against
them pursuant to 37 C.F.R § 1.617(a).
Jeon et al. responded to the order to show cause by
filing the following papers:
"RESPONSE OF JUNIOR PARTY JEON TO NOVEMBER 20, 1998
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE" (c.o.m. December 21, 1998 -
Paper Number 3); and,
"JUNIOR PARTY JEON PRELIMINARY MOTION
NO. 1" (c.o.m. December 21, 1998 - Paper Number 4)
In their response to the order to show cause, Jeon et
al., inter alia: requested a final hearing to review the
decision of the APJ as set forth in the order to show cause;
explained why judgment should not be entered against Jeon et
al; submitted additional evidence accompanied by an
explanation of "good cause" for proffering the additional
evidence; and, filed a motion under 37 C.F.R. § 1.633(g)
attacking the benefit accorded Cupps et al. in the notice
declaring this interference.
After the above-noted papers were filed, in an order
mailed on March 9, 1999 (Paper Number 5), the APJ provided the
senior party an opportunity to file an opposition to Jeon et
al.'s motion and also an opportunity to file their views on
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007