Interference 103,482 and 30-37 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, 1st and 2nd para. C. Ewen’s Motion for Benefit of the July 15, 1988, filing date of Application 07/220,007, now U.S. Patent 4,892,851 4. Dolle’s contentions Discussion 1. Background A. July 15, 1988 -- John A. Ewen and Abbas Razavi (hereafter Ewen et al.) filed U.S. Application 07/220,007, entitled “Process and Catalyst for Producing Syndiotactic Polyolefins.” B. May 20, 1989 -- Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft filed Application P 3916553.1, entitled “Syndio-Isoblockpolymer und Verfahren zu seiner Herstellung,” in the Federal Republic of Germany. C. October 10, 1989 -- John A. Ewen (hereafter Ewen) filed U.S. Application 07/419,221, entitled “Catalyst for Producing Hemiisotactic Polypropylene.” D. January 9, 1990 -- U.S. Patent 4,892,851 issued from Ewen et al. Application 07/220,007 filed July 15, 1988. E. May 17, 1990 -- Volker Dolle, Jurgen Rohrmann, Andreas Winter, Martin Antberg and Robert Klein (hereafter Dolle) filed U.S. Application 07/525,096, entitled “Syndio- 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007