Interference 103,482
for the subject matter of Count 1 or proposed Count 2 or 3, to
which Claim 8, amended as proposed in Dolle Motion For
Amending Claims No. 2 Under § 1.633 (Paper No. 23), is said to
correspond (Paper
No. 24, p. 1).
T. July 28, 1995 -- Dolle filed Dolle § 1.635 Motion To
Correct Obvious Error (Paper No. 42). Dolle moves to correct
an inadvertent omission from proposed Counts 2 and 3 of
Dolle’s
§ 1.633(c) Motion To Redefine Interfering Subject Matter
(Paper No. 15)(Paper No. 42, p. 1).
U. November 2, 1995 -- Ewen filed Ewen Motion To
Strike, 37 CFR § 1.635 Or Reply, 37 CFR § 1.638 (Paper No.
47). Ewen moves to strike Dolle’s reply (Paper No. 46) to
Ewen Supplemental Submission To Ewen Responsive Motion No. 3
(Paper No. 45) or to consider Ewen’s reply to Dolle’s reply
(Paper No. 47, p. 2).
V. June 30, 1998 -- An Administrative Patent Judge
(APJ) entered a Decision On Dolle Motion For Judgment Pursuant
To
37 CFR § 1.633(a)(Paper 14)(Paper No. 52). Preliminarily, the
APJ found that the full scope of the subject matter claimed in
12
Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007