Interference 103,482
§ 1.633(a)(Paper 14) in his June 30, 1998, Decision On Dolle
Motion For Judgment Pursuant To 37 CFR § 1.633(a)(Paper
14)(Paper No. 52). A decision granting Dolle Motion For
Judgment Pursuant To 37 CFR § 1.633(a)(Paper 14) that the
subject matter of Claims 1-3 and 5-8 of U.S. Patent
5,036,034, which corresponds
to original Count 1, is unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103, is
a condition precedent to Ewen Responsive Motion No. 2 To
Redefine Under 37 CFR § 1.633(c) And (i)(Paper 20)(Paper No.
56, p. 2).
AA. June 30, 1998 -- The APJ entered Decision On Dolle
§ 1.633(f) Motion (Paper 13)(Paper No. 57). The APJ granted
Dolle’s motion to be accorded benefit of the August 10, 1992,
filing date of U.S. Application 07/927,869; the May 17, 1990,
filing date of U.S. Application 07/525,096; and the May 20,
1989, filing date of Fed. Rep. Germany Application P3916553.1
for substitute Count 2 (Paper No. 57, p. 2). After concluding
that “[b]enefit of an earlier application for purposes of
priority requires only that an embodiment within the scope of
the count be described in the earlier copending application.
Weil v. Fritz, 572 F.2d 856, 865-66 n. 16, 196 USPQ 600, 608
n. 16 (CCPA 1978),” the APJ found (Paper No. 57, p. 3):
19
Page: Previous 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007