(emphasis in original). Hence, it would appear that no
modification to our MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER is necessary.
2. Palackal also requests that a correction be made
to page 64 to indicate that it is the Alt patent, not the
Japanese Application, which anticipates Resconi claims 14-18.
On page 64, we state "We find that the Japanese Application
anticipates Resconi claims 14-18 as follows:". We should have
stated that "We find that Alt anticipates Resconi claims 14-18
as follows:". A hand correction has been made on page 64 of
our MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER.
C. Final Judgment
Upon consideration of the record, it is
ORDERED that Palackal is not entitled to a patent
containing claims 1-2 of U.S. Patent 5,401,817, granted 28
March 1995, based on application 08/064,630, filed 20 May
1993.
FURTHER ORDERED that, on the record before the
board, Palackal is entitled to a patent containing claims 3
and 10-11 of U.S. Patent 5,401,817, granted 28 March 1995,
based on application 08/064,630, filed 20 May 1993.
FURTHER ORDERED that Resconi is not entitled to a
patent containing claims 14-18 of application 08/175,135,
filed 29 December 1993.
- 3 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007