DEAN et al v. HOEY - Page 1

                         The opinion in support of the decision being                 
                      entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.            
          Paper 18                                                                    
          Filed by:  Trial Section Merits Panel                                       
          Box Interference                         Filed                              
          Washington, D.C.  20231             25 October 2000                         
          Tel:  703-308-9797                                                          
          Fax:  703-305-0942                                                          
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                         RICHARD T. DEAN and GEORGE B. HOEY,                          
                                    Junior Party,                                     
                              (Application 07/777,793),                               
                                    JO KLAVENESS,                                     
                                    Senior Party                                      
                                 (Patent 4,714,607).                                  
                           Patent Interference No. 104,540                            
          Before:  McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and                  
          SCHAFER and GARDNER-LANE, Administrative Patent Judges.                     
          McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.                               
                         JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR  1.662                          
               Upon consideration of DEAN AND KLAVENESS MISCELLANEOUS                 
          MOTION 17 (Paper 17), wherein the parties agree that entry                  
          of judgment against Klaveness is appropriate and proper, and                
          request that the Board make such an entry, it is                            

Page:  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007