DEAN et al v. HOEY - Page 2



                    ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1                   
          (Paper 1, page 47), the sole count in the interference, is                  
          awarded against senior party Jo Klaveness.                                  
                    FURTHER ORDERED that senior party Klaveness is not                
          entitled to a patent containing claims 1-2, 5-6, 9 and 13                   
          (corresponding to Count 1) of U.S. Patent 4,714,607, granted                
          22 December 1987, based on application 06/739,228, filed 30 May             
          1985.                                                                       
                    FURTHER ORDERED that it is not necessary to determine             
          whether Dean's preliminary statement "establishes that the Dean             
          date of invention easily predates the Klaveness date of                     
          invention;" as alleged in Miscellaneous Motion 17, it                       
          nevertheless being noted that a preliminary statement is not                
          evidence in support of a contention of a party filing the                   
          preliminary statement (37 CFR § 1.629(e)).                                  
                    FURTHER ORDERED that further prosecution of the Dean              
          application involved in the interference will take place                    
          consistent with 37 CFR § 1.664.                                             
                    FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper shall be made           
          of record in files of Dean application 07/777,793 and Klaveness             
          U.S. Patent 4,714,607.                                                      




                                        - 2 -                                         




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007