The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 55
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
DAVID R. PACHOLOK
Junior Party, 1
HENRY H. HUTMACHER, JOHN E. WILL, JAMES YOUNGMAN,
PHILLIP D. LANE and MICHAEL V. BELL
Senior Party. 2
________________
Interference No. 103,830
________________
FINAL HEARING: December 13, 2000
________________
Before URYNOWICZ, MARTIN and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
FINAL DECISION
The invention at issue in this interference relates to an apparatus and method for disabling
a vehicle. The particular subject matter in issue is illustrated by counts 1 and 2 as follows:
Count 1
A vehicle disabling device capable of contacting a pursued vehicle, sending an electrical
discharge therethrough, and disabling at least one electric system of a vehicle; the vehicle
1 Application No. 08/367,581, filed January 3, 1995, now U.S. Patent No. 5,503,059, issued April 2, 1996.
2 Application No. 08/273,560, filed July 11, 1994. Assignors to Jaycor.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007