PARINS et al. V. SLATER - Page 12




          Interference No. 104,190                                                    



          USPQ 459, 473 (1965).  This history contains the complete                   
          record of all  the proceedings before the Patent and Trademark              
          Office, including any express representations made by the                   
          applicant regarding the scope of the claims.  As such, the                  
          record before the Patent and Trademark Office is often of                   
          critical significance in determining the meaning of the                     
          claims.  See Markman, 52 F.3d at 980,                                       
          34 USPQ2d at 1330; Southwall Tech., Inc. v. Cardinal IG Co.,                
          54 F.3d 1570, 1576, 34 USPQ2d 1673, 1676 (Fed. Cir.), cert.                 
          denied, 516 U.S. 987 (1995).  ("The prosecution history limits              
          the interpretation of claim terms so as to exclude any                      
          interpretation that was disclaimed during prosecution.")                    
          (citations omitted).  Included within an analysis of the file               
          history may be an examination of the prior art cited therein.               
          Autogiro Co. of Am. v. United States, 384 F.2d 391, 399, 155                
          USPQ 697, 704 (Ct. Cl. 1967)("In its broader use as source                  
          material, the prior art                                                     


          cited in the file wrapper gives clues as to what the claims do              
          not cover.").  Vitronics at 1583, 39 USPQ2d at 1577.                        

                                          12                                          





Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007