Interference No. 104,192
Cragg v. Martin v. Fogarty
88 and 90 do not define the same patentable
invention as any one of Fogarty’s claims 27-69.
Goicoechea’s preliminary motion 2 insofar as it
seeks a judgment based on no interference-in-fact is
denied.
- 80 -
Page: Previous 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007