Interference No. 104,192
Cragg v. Martin v. Fogarty
The Board states that insertion of the anchor
section and the first tubular graft as a unitary
whole is only one of two possibilities with regard
to the insertion of the Fogarty structure. Paper
No. 108, p.15. There is a third possibility ignored
by the Board, namely, inserting the anchor section
and both tubular grafts at the same time.
- 87 -
Page: Previous 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007