Interference No. 104,192
Cragg v. Martin v. Fogarty
skill in the art.
Cragg further argues that the Board has not explained
how, if Fogarty’s anchor section and first tubular graft are
inserted as one piece, a skilled worker would successfully
position that device. According to Cragg, because the first
tubular graft of
- 92 -
Page: Previous 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007