Interference No. 104,192
Cragg v. Martin v. Fogarty
the denial of Cragg’s preliminary motion 2.
Judgment
It is
ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of the
count is herein entered against junior party ERIC C. MARTIN
and also against junior party ANDREW H. CRAGG and MICHAEL D.
DAKE;
FURTHER ORDERED that the junior party ERIC C. MARTIN is
not entitled to his patent claims 2-17 which correspond to the
count;
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party ANDREW H. CRAGG and
MICHAEL D. DAKE are not entitled to their application claims
55, 59, 62-65, 88 and 90 which correspond to the count; and
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper shall be given
a paper number and filed in the respective involved
application/patent of the parties.10
10Failure to file a copy of any agreement regarding the
termination of this proceeding may render the agreement and
any resulting patent unenforceable. See section 35 U.S.C. §
135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.661.
- 96 -
Page: Previous 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007