Ex Parte GAUTHIER et al - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         
                                                                 Paper No. 21         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                      Ex parte THIERRY GAUTHIER and REGIS BONIFAY                     
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2000-0014                                 
                              Application No. 08/747,927                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                HEARD: JANUARY 10, 2001                               
                                     ____________                                     
          Before CALVERT, COHEN, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judges.          
          COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         



                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  


               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1                 
          through 15, all of the claims in the application.                           


               Appellants’ invention pertains to a device for injecting a             
          hydrocarbon charge into a catalytic cracking reactor and to a               
          method of catalytically cracking heavy hydrocarbon charges. A               
          basic understanding of the invention can be derived from a                  
          reading of exemplary claims 1 and 15, respective copies of which            
          appear in the APPENDIX to the main brief (Paper No. 14).                    






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007