The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte THIERRY GAUTHIER and REGIS BONIFAY ____________ Appeal No. 2000-0014 Application No. 08/747,927 ____________ HEARD: JANUARY 10, 2001 ____________ Before CALVERT, COHEN, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judges. COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 15, all of the claims in the application. Appellants’ invention pertains to a device for injecting a hydrocarbon charge into a catalytic cracking reactor and to a method of catalytically cracking heavy hydrocarbon charges. A basic understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claims 1 and 15, respective copies of which appear in the APPENDIX to the main brief (Paper No. 14).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007