Ex parte KUPIECKI - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
          publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                      

                                                            Paper No. 22              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    _____________                                     
                               Ex parte DAVID KUPIECKI                                
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 2000-0180                                  
                             Application No. 08/539,943                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before CALVERT, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   


          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                      
          rejection of claims 1 and 3 through 14, which are all of the                
          claims remaining in this application.  Claim 2 has been                     
          canceled.                                                                   


          Appellant’s invention is directed to a balloon catheter                     






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007