Appeal No. 2000-0180 Application No. 08/539,943 view of Goy, we note that on page 4 of the answer the examiner has urged that Samson discloses a medical catheter like that depicted in appellant’s invention “except for the delivery lumen with a delivery port proximal to the balloon.” To account for this difference the examiner turns to Goy, noting that Goy teaches a balloon dilation catheter used for delivery of drugs and/or contrast medium to the vasculature system via a second lumen (9) in the catheter which has a delivery port or opening (10) located proximal to the balloon (22) so as to allow access to and treatment of blood vessels that branch from main blood vessels. From these teachings, the examiner concludes that it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of appellant’s invention to provide a separate lumen for drug and contrast material delivery in the catheter of Samson with a delivery port proximal to the balloon as taught by Goy “since Goy teaches that it is desired in the art of balloon angioplasty to provide a delivery lumen and port proximal the balloon so one can access the branched blood vessels for treatment thereof and since Goy further teaches that balloon catheters can have separate lumens for the guidewire and for infusion of drugs or 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007