Appeal No. 2000-0203
Application No. 08/924,099
fall with parent claim 1 in accordance with the claim grouping
and substantive arguments set forth in the appellant’s brief.
SUMMARY
The appeal as to claim 9, which has been allowed by the
examiner, is dismissed; and the decision of the examiner to
reject claims 1, 2, 7 and 8 is affirmed.
No period for taking any subsequent action in connection
with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
LAWRENCE J. STAAB ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JOHN P. McQUADE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JPM/gjh
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007