Ex parte SKINKISS - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2000-0226                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 08/694,200                                                  


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellant's invention relates to a method of, and                  
          apparatus for sealing fireplaces to prevent the loss of                     
          conditioned air from the living quarters through such                       
          fireplaces (specification, p. 1).  A copy of claims 1 to 4, 6               
          and 8 under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the                      
          appellant's brief (Paper No. 11, filed July 21, 1998).  A copy              
          of claim 7 under appeal is set forth on page 3 of the                       
          examiner's answer (Paper No. 12, mailed May 25, 1999).                      


               The prior art of record relied upon by the examiner in                 
          rejecting the appealed claims is:                                           
          Knudson                  1,830,364                     Nov.  3,             
          1931                                                                        
          Reiner                   3,789,825                     Feb.  5,             
          1974                                                                        
          Le Brun                  3,888,232                     June 10,             
          1975                                                                        
          Gallagher                     4,072,140                     Feb.            
          7, 1978                                                                     
          Fox et al. (Fox)         4,160,442                     July 10,             
          1979                                                                        
          The examiner also relied upon the appellant's admission of                  
          prior art (shown in Figure 1 and described in the                           
          specification at page 4, lines 6-10) relating to a                          
          conventional fireplace (Admitted Prior Art).                                









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007