Appeal No. 2000-0226 Page 8 Application No. 08/694,200 established by combining the teachings of the prior art to produce the claimed invention, absent some teaching or suggestion supporting the combination." ACS Hosp. Sys., Inc. v. Montefiore Hosp., 732 F.2d 1572, 1577, 221 USPQ 929, 933 (Fed. Cir. 1984). And "teachings of references can be combined only if there is some suggestion or incentive to do so." Id. Here, the applied prior art contains none. None of the applied prior art suggests providing a frameless sheet of thin pliable material positioned across the means for closing- off the frontal opening of the fireplace. Instead, the patent to Le Brun teaches (column 4, lines 45-49; Figure 2) placing the fireplace shutoff behind the conventional removable screen, not in front of the conventional removable screen (i.e., the means for closing-off the frontal opening of the fireplace). Instead, it appears to us that the examiner relied on hindsight in reaching his obviousness determination. However, our reviewing court has said, "To imbue one of ordinary skill in the art with knowledge of the invention in suit, when no prior art reference or references of record convey or suggestPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007