Ex parte SAAR - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2000-0327                                          Page 2            
          Application No. 08/745,330                                                      


               Appellant's invention relates to a system for monitoring                   
          water consuming structures.  An understanding of the invention                  
          can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is                    
          reproduced as follows:                                                          
               1.  A system for monitoring a water consuming structure                    
          supplied by a water pipe comprising                                             
               means for determining that a selected volume of water has                  
          flowed through the pipe during a period of time not exceeding                   
          a predetermined period of time, and                                             
               means for transmitting an alarm signal in the event that                   
          said determining means determines that said selected volume of                  
          water has flowed through the pipe to said water consuming                       
          structure during a period of time not exceeding said                            
          predetermined period of time.                                                   
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                      
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                                  
          Gastouniotis et al.        4,940,976           Jul. 10,                         
          1990                                                                            
          (Gastouniotis)                                                                  
          Thompson             5,441,070         Aug. 15, 1995                            

               The following rejections have been applied against the                     
          claims :2                                                                         



               2 The final rejection included a rejection of claim 17 under 35 U.S.C.     
          § 112, first paragraph.  As the examiner has not repeated this rejection on     
          appeal, we consider the rejection to have been withdrawn.                       







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007