Appeal No. 2000-0372 Application No. 08/421,338 The examiner relies on the following references: Dujari 4,984,151 Jan. 08, 1991 Stewart EP 500,238 Aug. 26, 1992 Claims 1-4 and 6-10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Stewart in view of Dujari. Reference is made to the briefs and answer for the respective positions of appellants and the examiner. OPINION Stewart is directed to a header translation unit for an asynchronous transfer mode [ATM] switching system, similar to appellants’. In Stewart, a content addressable memory [CAM] is used to effect a mapping function between a plurality of logical addresses and a plurality of physical addresses. CAM 5 is under the control of control unit 6. When a data cell is received on line 2, Policing and Header Translation Unit [PHTU] 1 extracts the virtual path identifier [VPI] and virtual channel identifier [VCI] fields from the ATM cell header. CAM 5 is then searched for these two fields to see if a match can be found. If matching values are found, CAM 5 provides an output signal on line 9 corresponding to the physical address for the particular match for storage in RAM 8. PHTU 1 has the function of translating the incoming ATM cell data into a form which can be switched by a switch network 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007