The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte OSAMU KOIZUMI
____________
Appeal No. 2000-0558
Application No. 08/912,585
____________
HEARD: JANUARY 24, 2001
____________
Before STAAB, McQUADE, and LAZARUS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LAZARUS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 2, 3 and 7 through 9, which are all of the
claims pending in this application.1
1 Finally rejected claims 1, 5 and 6 were canceled via applicant's amendments
filed January 29, 1999 (Paper No. 11) and April 1, 1999 (Paper No. 15), entry
of which was approved as indicated by the examiner in the advisory actions
mailed February 9, 1999 (Paper No. 13) and April 12, 1999 (Paper No. 16).
Claim 9 was added to replace claim 6 in Paper No. 11 and was further amended
in Paper No. 15.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007