Ex parte CHAN et al. - Page 9




          Appeal No. 2000-0606                                                        
          Application No. 08/755,435                                                  


               From our perspective, even assuming the napkins stacked                
          in Downham's device were interfolded as described on page 9 of              
          appellants' brief with alternating top and bottom fold                      
          arrangements and the leading flap of each napkin being                      
          interfolded ahead of the trailing flap of the preceding                     
          napkin, the central region of the forwardmost of such napkins               
          in the stack would still be caused to bulge into the space 36               
          by the support arrangement of the upper and lower adaptors 29,              
          32, as illustrated in Figure 3, thereby being accessible to                 
          the user's fingers/thumb for removal.   Moreover, while the3                                      
          alternating fold pattern would not present a flap having an                 
          upper free end for each napkin in the stack as does the non-                
          interfolded stack disclosed by Downham, the Downham dispenser               
          is capable of dispensing a stack of appropriately sized                     
          interfolded napkins having leading and trailing flaps of                    
          adjacent napkins sufficiently tightly or securely interfolded               
          in much the same manner described on page 7 of appellants'                  


               While such gripping of the bulged portions of napkins having folds on3                                                                     
          top may not be as easy as gripping of a downwardly and forwardly disposed flap
          extending from a bottom fold as taught by Downham, it is not apparent to us 
          why such gripping is not possible, especially given the similarity of the   
          dispensing face of Downham's dispenser to the dispensing face of appellants'
          disclosed dispenser.                                                        
                                          9                                           





Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007