Ex parte CHAN et al. - Page 16




          Appeal No. 2000-0606                                                        
          Application No. 08/755,435                                                  


          Downham.  Accordingly, we cannot sustain the examiner's                     
          rejection of claim 3, or claims 4, 12 and 13 which also                     
          require two curved bumpers having ribs defined thereon.                     
                                     CONCLUSION                                       
               To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject                   
          claims 1-19 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed as to claims 1,               
          2, 5-11 and 14-19 and reversed as to claims 3, 4, 12 and 13.                

























                                         16                                           





Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007