Ex parte BROWN - Page 6




              Appeal No. 2000-0643                                                                                        
              Application 08/273,423                                                                                      
                     Claim 15, directed to a “method of treatment for hair restoration” comprising                        
              administering a corticosteroid and a Vitamin A derivative to hairless skin, stands rejected                 
              as unpatentable over Kligman, Bazzano and Lesnik.                                                           

                     Bazzano teaches that topical application of all-trans-retinoic acid alters the hair-                 

              growth cycle in the C3H mouse model by prolonging the anagen phase and shortening the                       
              telogen phase.  According to the reference, “[t]his effect is similar to the effect of minoxidil            
              on the hair cycle dynamics in this animal model.”  Abstract.                                                
                     Kligman discloses a method of treating alopecia (hair loss) comprising topical                       
              application of a composition comprising minoxidil and a corticosteroid to affected areas of                 
              the human scalp.  According to Kligman, the method prevents the “chronic inflammatory                       
              process, subtending to the hair bulbs, in patterned alopecia, [which] lead[s] to eventual                   

              scarring of the lower follicle, making regrowth impossible.”  Abstract, and the paragraph                   
              bridging columns 3 and 4.  In addition, we note that Kligman reports that “[t]he use of                     
              retinoids alone or in combination with minoxidil . . . to increase hair growth” is known.                   
              Paragraph bridging columns 2 and 3.                                                                         
                     We agree with the examiner that it would have been obvious for one skilled in the                    

              art “to employ corticosteroids and all-trans-retinoic acid together in a single hair loss                   

              treatment since each was known separately for the same purpose.”  Examiner’s Answer,                        
              page 3.  (“[T]he idea of combining them flows logically from their having been individually                 
              taught in the in the prior art.”  In re Kerkhoven, 626 F.2d 846, 850, 205 USPQ 1069, 1072                   


                                                            6                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007