Appeal No. 2000-0653
Application No. 08/960,433
a copy of which appears in the APPENDIX to the brief (Paper
No. 12).
As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the
documents listed below:
McQuaid et al. (McQuaid) 1,469,424 Oct.
2, 1923
Kameyama 5,277,499 Jan. 11,
1994
The following rejection is before us for review.
Claims 1, 2, 6, and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Kameyama in view of
McQuaid.
The full text of the examiner's rejection and response to
the argument presented by appellant appears in the final
rejection and the answer (Paper Nos. 6 and 13), while the
complete statement of appellant's argument can be found in the
main and reply briefs (Paper Nos. 12 and 14).
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007