Ex parte LEE - Page 6




         Appeal No. 2000-0653                                                      
         Application No. 08/960,433                                                


         with a convex shape form is to prevent striking of a                      
         peripheral edge of the shaft end with the surface of the                  
         insert member 8, without having to engage in high precision               
         machining to obtain a high degree of square on the end surface            
         of the shaft and the thrust receiver surface (column 1, lines             
         64 through 68 and column 2, lines 17 through 22 and 32 through            
         35).                                                                      


              Distinct from the apparatus of the Kameyama patent, the              
         McQuaid reference teaches an end thrust ball bearing wherein              
         the end of a rotary shaft 9 (Fig. 1) or a rotatable plate 26              
         as in Fig. 6 (engaged by the end of a rotary shaft) is                    
         continuously engaged with a ball 8 positioned in a recess or              
         seat 22 of a plate 19.                                                    


              Considering the circumstances that Kameyama and McQuaid              
         may fairly be said to teach alternative thrust bearing                    
         arrangements, i.e., fluid bearing vs. ball bearing, and that              
         Kameyama expressly discloses making a convex thrust receiver              
         surface 32 a part of an insert member 28, it is our opinion               
         that one having ordinary skill in the art would not have                  
                                        6                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007