The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today was not written for publication
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DANIEL J. CARLSEN and GEORGE F. PARKER
____________
Appeal No. 2000-0816
Application No. 08/938,875
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CALVERT, PATE and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.
PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner's refusal to allow
claims 1, 4-7, 10-14, 17-20, 23-26, 29-33, 36-39, 42-45, 48-
52, 55-57, 60-63, 66-70, 73-75, 81, 82, 85, 88 and 89. All
independent claims except independent claim 33 have been
amended after the claims were last rejected and the Notice of
Appeal filed. Claims 2, 3, 8, 9, 15, 16, 21, 22, 27, 28, 34,
35, 40, 41, 46, 47, 53, 54, 58, 59, 64, 65, 71, 72, 76-80, 83,
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007