Appeal No. 2000-0909 Application No. 08/784,752 system for the drive rollers 20 (see col. 5, ll. 59-63 and col. 7, ll. 41-44) and the speed of rotation of the electrical motor 41 in dependence on the position of the carriage 40 and the signals from the sensor 37 and the rotary sender 39 (see col. 8, ll. 20-24). The examiner determined that Nyfeler teaches a “means (34) [sic, (40)?] responsive to the first and second sensors (37 and 38) for simultaneously adjusting by equal and opposite amounts path lengths followed by the carrier (5) on the input and output sides of the transfer station (11).” See answer, p. 4. In support, the examiner cites the following disclosure at col. 8, ll. 2-8 of Nyfeler (answer, p. 8): Movement of the carriage 40 in the forward feed direction 8 or in opposite relationship thereto increases the speed of the backing strip 5 in the sticking plane 18 relative to the strip speed B or reduces it, or reverses it, in other words the backing strip 5 is pulled back by a predetermined length in opposite relationship to the forward feed direction 8. In our opinion, the examiner’s position that movement of Nyfeler’s carriage 40 between first 44 and second 45 reversal 10Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007