Ex parte MASUNARI et al. - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 2000-0915                                                                                     Page 2                        
                 Application No. 09/064,083                                                                                                             


                          The appellants' invention relates to "a vehicle power                                                                         
                 supply system, and is applicable to the prevention of a                                                                                
                 vehicle fire which is caused by the power supply damage which                                                                          
                 may occur at the time of vehicle collision" (specification, p.                                                                         
                 1).  A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the                                                                             
                 appendix to the appellants' brief.                                                                                                     


                          The prior art references of record relied upon by the                                                                         
                 examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                                                                                         
                 Balban                                       3,980,318                                    Sep. 14, 1976                                
                 Kanazawa et al.                              JP 6-321027         1                        Nov. 22, 1994                                
                 (Kanazawa)                                                                                                                             



                          Claims 1 to 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                                                                         
                 being unpatentable over Kanazawa in view of Balban.                                                                                    


                          Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced                                                                     
                 by the examiner and the appellants regarding the above-noted                                                                           


                          1In determining the teachings of Kanazawa, we will rely                                                                       
                 on the translation provided by the USPTO.  A copy of the                                                                               
                 translation is attached for the appellants' convenience.                                                                               







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007