Ex parte EVANS et al. - Page 2


                Appeal No. 2000-1272                                                                            
                Application No. 08/861,095                                                                      

                a biodegradable soluble coating (26).1  Being biodegradable, the binder and the coating         
                enable the earthen tee to “return into the ground after use by the golfer” ( main brief,        
                page 2).  This action avoids the harmful effect that wooden or plastic tees have on             
                maintenance equipment such as grass cutting equipment.                                          
                       Claim 1, the only independent article claim on appeal, recites that the golf tee         
                comprises “an earthen material; a biodegradable binder material; and a biodegradable            
                soluble polymer coating having a desired thickness.”                                            
                          A copy of the appealed claims is appended to appellants’ brief.                       
                          The following references are relied upon by the examiner as evidence of               
                obviousness in support of his rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103:                                 
                Whelan et al. (Whelan)           3,954,263                May   4, 1976                        
                Desmarais                       4,014,541                Mar. 29, 1977                        
                Takeno                         5,082,264                Jan.   21, 1992                      
                Mang, Michael, et al., “Synthesis and  Properties of New Biodegradable Polyesters               
                Derived from Diacids and Diglycidyl Ethers”, The Dow Chemical Company, pgs 417-                 
                418, May 20, 1997.                                                                              
                          The appealed claims stand rejected under § 103 as follows:                            
                          1. Claims 1-3, 5, 7, 8 and 17-19 as unpatentable over Takeno in view of               
                Mang;                                                                                           
                          2. Claims 9-12 as unpatentable over Takeno in view of Mang and Desmarais;             


                          3. Claims 1-3, 5, 7, 8 and 17-19 as unpatentable over Whelan in view of               
                Mang;                                                                                           


                                                                                                                
                1 According to Technomic Publishing’s Glossary of Biotechnology Terms  by Kimball R. Nill (2001) (see
                biotechterms.org), the term “biodegradable” describes “any material that can be broken down by biological
                action.”                                                                                        

                                                       2                                                        



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007