Appeal No. 2000-1272 Application No. 08/861,095 For the foregoing reasons we cannot agree that the evidence adduced by the examiner is sufficient to establish a prima facie case of obviousness of the claimed subject matter. The examiner’s decision to reject claims 1 through 3, 5, 7 through 12 and 17 through 19 under § 103 is therefore reversed. REVERSED HARRISON E. MCCANDLISH ) Senior Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) RICHARD B. LAZARUS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007