Ex parte SCHULZ et al. - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 2000-1346                                                                                                                   
                 Application 08/730,516                                                                                                                 


                 Kastovich et al.          3,372,740              Mar. 12, 1968                                                                         
                 (Kastovich)                                                                                                                            
                 Schmitt-Raiser et al.     5,042,570              Aug. 27, 1991                                                                         
                 (Schmitt-Raiser)                                                                                                                       





                 Planzer                     730,361              Mar. 22, 1966                                                                         
                 Canadian Patent Document                                                                                                               
                 Kuwazawa et al.            3-175218              Jul. 30, 1991                                                                         
                 Japanese Patent Document1                                                                                                              
                 The background discussion on page 1 of the appellants’                                                                                 
                 specification concerning the “heretofore” known use of                                                                                 
                 relatively thin metal tiles in suspended ceiling                                                                                       
                 heating/cooling configurations (the admitted prior art)                                                                                
                                                              THE REJECTIONS                                                                            
                          Claims 1 through 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                                                                           
                 103(a) as being unpatentable over the Canadian reference in                                                                            
                 view of Rupp.                                                                                                                          
                          Claims 1 through 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                                                                           
                 103(a) as being unpatentable over the Canadian reference in                                                                            


                          1An English language translation of this reference,                                                                           
                 prepared by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, is                                                                          
                 appended hereto.                                                                                                                       

                                                                           3                                                                            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007