Appeal No. 2000-1346
Application 08/730,516
view of Rupp, and either Schmitt-Raiser or the admitted prior
art.
Claims 2 through 4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103(a) as being unpatentable over the Canadian reference in
view of Rupp and Kastovich.
Claims 2 through 4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103(a) as being unpatentable over the Canadian reference in
view of Rupp, either Schmitt-Raiser or the admitted prior art,
and Kastovich.
Claim 6 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over the Canadian reference in view of Rupp and
the Japanese reference.
Claim 6 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over the Canadian reference in view of Rupp,
either Schmitt-Raiser or the admitted prior art, and the
Japanese reference.
Claims 7 and 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over the Canadian reference in view of Rupp
and either Raider or Rapp.
Claims 7 and 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over the Canadian reference in view of
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007