Appeal No. 2000-1472 Application No. 08/855,104 made by the appellant’s counsel at the telephonic oral hearing held on February 13, 2001, to the effect that to control the flow through the apertures in the piston, the valve must completely close the apertures. Turning now to the merits of the § 102 rejection of claims 1 through 4, at page 3 through 5 of the answer, the examiner determined that both Figures 2 and 3 of Axthammer disclose each and every element of appealed claim 1. With reference to Figure 2, the examiner describes the reference as teaching a piston 118 dividing a cylinder 110 into first and second fluid chambers 12a and 12b, a first and second series of apertures 120 and 122 extending through the piston from one fluid chamber to the other, a first plate type valve (shown by plates 124b1, 124b2, 124b3, 124a, 124c1 and 124c2) for controlling the flow through the first series of apertures and a second plate type valve (shown in Fig. 2 located above annular channel 146) for controlling the flow through the second series of apertures, each of the plate type valves being biased to positions preventing flow through the respective series of apertures, and at least one of the plate 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007