Ex Parte MCCAVOUR - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2000-1654                                                        
          Application 09/097,860                                                      

          in unison when a load is applied to said arch structure, said               
          shear bond connectors providing a plurality of curved beam column           
          stiffeners to enhance combined positive and negative bending                
          resistance and axial load resistance of said base arch structure,           
          there being a sufficient number of said second series of plates             
          to provide a sufficient number of said curved beam column                   
          stiffeners to support anticipated loads imposed on said                     
          structure.                                                                  
                                   THE PRIOR ART                                      
               The references relied on by the examiner to support the                
          final rejection are:                                                        
          Sivachenko                      4,186,541         Feb.  5, 1980             
          Gurtner et al. (Gurtner)        4,318,635         Mar.  9, 1982             
          Wilson et al. (Wilson)          5,326,191         Jul.  5, 1994             
          Sattler et al., (Sattler)2        2657229         Jul. 28, 1977             
          German Patent Document                                                      
                                    THE REJECTION                                     
               Claims 1 through 23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)            
          as being unpatentable over the combined teachings of Wilson,                
          Gurtner, Sivachenko and Sattler.                                            
               Attention is directed to the appellant’s main and reply                
          briefs (Paper Nos. 10 and 13) and to the examiner’s final                   
          rejection and answer (Paper Nos. 3 and 11) for the respective               

               2 An English language translation of this reference,                   
          prepared on behalf of the United States Patent and Trademark                
          Office, is appended hereto.  The record also contains a                     
          translation submitted by the appellant with the main brief (Paper           
          No. 10).  We have used the Office translation in discussing the             
          reference in this decision.                                                 
                                          3                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007