Appeal No. 2000-1654
Application 09/097,860
that the differences between the subject matter recited in claim
1 and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole
would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a
person having ordinary skill in the art. We shall therefore
sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of claim 1 and
of claims 2 through 23 which stand or fall therewith.
SUMMARY
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 through 23
is affirmed.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007