Ex parte VALIULIS - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of                 
          the Board.                                                                  
                                                            Paper No. 37              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                     __________                                       
                             Ex parte THOMAS E. VALIULIS                              
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2000-1666                                  
                               Application 08/754,245                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                               HEARD: August 14, 2001                                 
                                     ___________                                      

          Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT, and PATE, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                          

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 1, 2, 4 through 8, 12 through 20, 26                    
          through 28, 40 through 49 and 52 through 56.  Subsequent to                 
          filing the Notice of Appeal, appellant filed amendments (Paper              
          Nos. 29 and 32) requesting cancellation of claims 1, 2, 4                   
          through 9 and 12, and requesting changes to claims 13 through               
          17 and 19.  Those amendments were approved for entry by the                 
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007